25.5.08 - Action-research and adaptive governance and management in the Doñana region
This line of work traces one continuous inquiry, unfolding over roughly a decade. It began on the ground, with Caracoles Estate in Doñana National Park: reflooding 27 km² of former farmland to restore part of the Doñana marshes, one of Europe's largest wetland restorations. Rather than engineer a single "optimal" flood regime, the team treated restoration as an adaptive management experiment—a mosaic of ponds of varying depths and shapes, designed to learn from rather than presume the answer.
Caracoles worked as a proof of concept. But it also exposed a harder problem: the wider institutions governing Doñana's water and conservation kept reverting to top-down, command-and-control management, even after repeated crises and clear opportunities for change. We traced two centuries of that history to explain why, coining the term "rigid institutional regime" for a system that is resilient to shocks but blind to the adaptive approaches it needs. An action-research program—interviews and workshops with 30+ decision-makers and stakeholders—translated that diagnosis into a concrete roadmap for change.
My PhD thesis draws all three strands together: the historical and institutional analyses, the Caracoles counter-example, and comparative fieldwork on adaptive management in British Columbia, closing with policy recommendations for water management and wetland conservation in Doñana and the Guadalquivir Estuary (see Chapter 9)—a blueprint for unlocking change in systems that mistake rigidity for stability.